4/11/10

neuroquantology - or - here comes a new challenger

after our (as the people's physicists front) yarman triumph through wiki deletion and witnessing the unfolding of the anılır story it was time for a new target, a new challenge. and our wishes were fulfilled without further ado. behold:

NeuroQuantology

as my fellow physicist comrades point out the necessity of violent physical force against the bullshit users of the term "quantum" we are set out to find and ridicule relevant bullshit. like quantum leadership or quantum therapy. in between the penis size increase google ads, some kind of personal help book pops out of the white noise with some kind of scientific reference.

we of course know the fringes which relate consciousness with quantum processes which are even worse than the gravitation fringes which only are interested in the physics theories. the reason being, when the bullshit theories diffuse to the scientific area concerned with human issues, the applications of the relevant bullshit to real life situations become immense hence the possibility to infect and effect the society is considerable. but nothing would have prepared us for the horror of a journal in citation index.

first of all meet the person behind the scene, doctor sultan tarlacı. he is a medical doctor of neurology working in our lovely city of izmir, at a private hospital. he is a writer of many books and operator of a blog called quantum brain (kuantumbeyin) which is a "best of" assembly of bullshit buzzwords including but not only constrained to: quantum, psi, parapsychology, neurophilosophy. he also publicizes his books on brain, psychology and quantum physics and seems to have gathered some following due to his exotic assortment of topics.

there is nothing wrong up to this point. but when the jokes stop being a joke and the feyerabendian distopic scientific practice (=proliferation of the "truth value" of a topic through propaganda and public relations) starts to be applied for this pseudo scientific discourse then the line needs to be drawn. it turns out neuroquantology is not just a bullshit topic in a blog but a editor reviewed journal.

as good rationalist physicists we disseminated the bullshit and appropriately ridiculed it on friendfeed. but the funny thing is, apparently our dear doctor googles himself hence paid us a visit and even made us famous in his blog by answering our allegations and linking to our friendfeed topic!

the title is "the brain impaired are squeezing for fat in a fly," referring to a turkish proverb.

nevertheless he made us so happy that, rather than answering to him in friendfeed we decided to put our allegations here, also in english, to start up disillusioning the not only the current status of quantology but also the thompson-reuters which put the journal to the list.

anyhow; tarlacı's rebuttals of our allegations are irrelevant and amusing at best: ranging from his test scores as a medical student, to sadly not being able to make money from "his new paradigm." but the most disturbing ones are first, as formerly mentioned the isi indexing of neuroquantology which is a long topic that i will go into detail; and secondly the inclusion of nobel laureate brian david josephson in their editorial board. according to tarlaci's logic, josephson's existence in their journal should prove the scientific nature of it.

for the uninformed; josephson is won the nobel prize in physics (1973) for his work on condensed matter when he was 33 (24 according to tarlacı), and then later he moved onto more greener pastures, i.e. mind–matter unification project. this sudden shift to more speculative topics, led him to multiple ordeals like being banned from arXiv for a while to being the target of scientists for supporting pseudoscience in royal mail's nobel stamp series.


"Josephson believes that psychics and telepaths may be able to direct random energy at sub-atomic levels for their own purposes, and in the commemorative stamp booklet writes that developments in information and quantum theories 'may lead to an explanation of processes still not understood within conventional science, such as telepathy'. It is not a suggestion that has gone down well with fellow Nobel laureates, however."


in this piece i don't want to condone any scientist of any stature; but i just want to point out that one should evaluate the scientific value of a proposal on the basis of the argument, not on the basis of who said it, what is the former accomplishments of the person. from this respect, the arguments and interests of josephson is not currently accepted by the rest of the scientific community. call it orthodoxy or not, unfortunately this is peer review. a concept that neuroquantology journal does not have.

having said all this, actually josephson himself also voiced concerns about the publication quality of the journal neuroquantology for the case of a paper which explained poltergeist activity as a quantum effect. his response to the new scientist was "this looks distinctly flaky to me."

so we decide to evaluate neuroquantology (which tarlaci refers to as "my journal"), on the basis of its contents, not based on whether thomson-reuters listed it in citation index or on your editors (who find the papers inside "distincly flaky" by the way), but evaluate them on their contents. and the final resolution is they are an intellectual pollution to the scientific commons, just ingullible accumulation of bullshit buzzwords, written with the style and sophistication of a first year engineering student taking a class on philosophy.

we will continue our quest to find and ridicule the NQ papers, to exemplify how bad it is to leave the decision of what science is and is not at the hands of cooperations like thomson-reuters.

here are some of my current favorites.

* A Game-Theoretic Approach to Metaphysical Reconciliation of Quantum Superposition
* A Neuroquantologic Approach to How Human Thought Might Affect the Universe
* A Robotic Program that Acquires Concepts and Begins Introspection

11 comments:

  1. Harry Frankfurt defines "bullshitter" as someone who does not care about the truth but tries to impress others (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit#In_philosophy). With all respect to those who are investigating quantum effects in neurological systems, we see that the aim of Dr. Tarlacı is not this. As we see from his appearance in Turkish media claiming psychics will find the whereabouts of renegade murderer Cem Garipoglu, he is seeking fame and prestige through orchestrating an organization of fringe scientists under neuroquantology journal and it is not surprising to see juggling of physical theories (without respecting their domain of validity) along with nonsense ideas and buzzwords to give support of their fringe theories in neuroquantology papers. However, the most important point in this, as you point out, is how this journal found it's way in ISI.

    ReplyDelete
  2. apparently tarlaci deleted his comments from his blog, but unfortunately google stalinism helps us in tracking down the deleted page http://goo.gl/F93L

    ReplyDelete
  3. who are some of the more credible scientists who have studied quantum theory and neuroscience?

    ReplyDelete
  4. maybe there aren't any.

    ReplyDelete
  5. actually there are, which makes life a lot harder. penrose (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose) is a card carrying member of this group of scientists, and of course as mentioned before brian josephson.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dr. Tarlaci is talking about Remote Viewing. If the subject is such a "bullshit" as you claim, than why is it that many government

    organizations spend great amount of funds on the topic.? I suggest you educate yourself on the subject before you demonize and take pleasure in

    character assasination of well meaning people. Besides who died and made you God?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dr.Talraci is doing a commendable job. The negative remarks are I suspect, the job of
    the scientific establishment to scuttle any new creativity. How many junk papers are getting published in most respected journals? Papers does not make any sense? Nobody raises a word against those. If a paper is absurd one should criticize the paper not the editor for it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I cannot believe that this kind of journal(neuroquantology) find a place among the SCI journals. Is not there any control mechanism to regularly check the papers published in it? They are doing the most dangerous thing: Mixing the real science and pseudoscience. Only highly educated brains can distingush the hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think this writer needs to actually do some research on the topic first before dismissing it outright. Scientific fundamentalism like this masquerading as rationalism is quite toxic to open debate.

    ReplyDelete
  10. first rule of fight club, no one talk about it.

    ReplyDelete